Re: XF86Config-4?
Spider <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.newbies |
|---|---|
| Organization | Chaotic |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
begin quote On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:09:49 +0000 Kent Jantz <[email protected]> wrote: > I not knowledgeable about the following questions so they may seem > kind of juvenile to some people. > > 1. Why isn't there an XF86Config-4 files instead of XF86Config file in > Gentoo? Because there isn't a XF86Config either in Gentoo, the users create their own. > > 2. Does XF86Config-4 offer some advantages, in the Graphics area, over > XF86Config? Nah.. its there for backwards compability. check is: is there a XF86Config-4 ? read that if not, check for XF86Config only so you can havfe dual X installs with different configurations (configureation format changed between 3.3.x and 4.x ) no other reason really. //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9c9g2ZS9CZTi033kRAi00AJ0Zq8hCbNkJ6hmh2pxgjG3mDSLBSgCeOLGC 9mCnglJNucKFHwtdqWE2MXk= =0hCy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----