Re: performance testing
Daniel Armyr <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:50:27 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.performance |
|---|---|
| Organization | Irrbloss Productions |
| Message-ID | <20070429105027.71bbd635@beech> |
> Quite frankly, I'd be surprised if a Gentoo server was significantly > faster than a CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 clone) server on a high-intensity > server workload. But I have tried a lot of distros for scientific > workstations, and Gentoo does seem to have an advantage there. I would have to agree. The performance gains in Gentoo tend to (In the Real World(tm) ) come from not having a bunch of crap instaled an running that hogs memory rather than from using a particular set of optimizing flags. Further, real-word servers ten to be built with some performance margin in order to handle load spikes, so a few percent here and there wouldn't really be measurable, assuming you compare to a system that isn't bloated. Further,this list has averaged at about one post per month since around 2003 when I joined, so don't expect to gett too many replies from here. --DA
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGNFxX2KAkGGGTwxYRAkLlAJ4i9/5XxQUoxesFMC+0HR3Z2F+3NQCggW7X gPI+HYfdm1szsjCZ7LlqnC4= =C79x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----