Re: performance testing
"Guillaume Ceccarelli" <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:34:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have to agree with Daniel here. This list is very low traffic. If you want to reach a broad part of the gentoo community, I think the Gentoo forums could be the way to go. ( http://forums.gentoo.org ). As for the performance tests, I don't think either that the server world would give you a lot of differences in terms of performance whether you're using Gentoo or a popular server-oriented binary distro. Just my 2 cents... On 4/29/07, Daniel Armyr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Quite frankly, I'd be surprised if a Gentoo server was significantly > > faster than a CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 clone) server on a high-intensity > > server workload. But I have tried a lot of distros for scientific > > workstations, and Gentoo does seem to have an advantage there. > > I would have to agree. The performance gains in Gentoo tend to (In the > Real World(tm) ) come from not having a bunch of crap instaled an > running that hogs memory rather than from using a particular set of > optimizing flags. Further, real-word servers ten to be built with some > performance margin in order to handle load spikes, so a few percent > here and there wouldn't really be measurable, assuming you compare to a > system that isn't bloated. > > Further,this list has averaged at about one post per month since around > 2003 when I joined, so don't expect to gett too many replies from here. > > --DA > >