Re: Gentoo Linux into the future

Zack Gilburd <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jun 2003 04:14:28 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.sysadmin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 26 June 2003 03:46 am, Wade Mealing wrote:
> > I think that making Gentoo more organized is a very good ide. As the
> > number of Gentoo users grow so dose the number of Gentoo server. As a
> > Gentoo user I fell fine. But a sysadmin has other needs then the user.
> > In my experience a sysadmin has the following needs:
> > 1. Time. Especially in the privet sector you can't spend days on end
> > setting up a server.
>
> Very good point, although this is how im doing it in the field at the
> moment, i have some basic roll-outs that i've built, but these arn't
> public and I cant afford to hose them.

I think that drobbins' post about this to the GDML really puts the foot dow=
n=20
about organization and accountablility.

> > 2. Stability. We have to trust that the packets that we emerge are
> > stable enough for our production servers. Testing them out ourselves
> > takes to much time (ref point number one)
>
> True, maybe we could setup another profile for the GSP  ? (Jumping ahead
> of this mail there maybe)

Stablity is a HUGE factor.  Perhaps if you have a gentoo server profile=20
selected and you emerge -p a package, i an extra field would be present for=
=20
rating the stability.... Example:

***
emerge -p postfix

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N   5 ] net-mail/postfix-2.0.12-r1
***

Where 5 would be the most stable and 1 would be the least.

> > 3. Other security needs. We need secure systems but without loosing too
> > much user friendliness.
>
> Another good point, although we are starting from a good base system,
> security and user-friendly ness dont usually go hand in hand.

Perhaps another field in emerge -p?  I am sure something could be figured o=
ut=20
for emerge -s, too.

> > I also want to ask Klieber if he would like to represent the Gentoo
> > server community as he is already a top level developer. He is already a
> > frequent user of the #gentoo-server and a dam good linux Gentoo user,
> > sysadmin, developer. He has both the skill and the knowledge to do the
> > job.
>
> No challenges here.

AFAIK, klieber is against the idea of gentoo-server becoming too high on th=
e=20
agenda.  I don't see why we wouldn't need carpaski just to implement the=20
above emerge -p stuff, alone.

I hope this helps,
Regards

klasikahl, Gentoo's youngest (?) sysadmin of a production server.  (I am 15=
=2E) =20
Perhaps also the youngest person to ever obtain a Linux+ certification?=20
<http://tehunlose.com/images/linux+cert.jpg>  I am still looking for proof =
of=20
the latter. :)

=2D-=20
Zack Gilburd
 http://tehunlose.com
  GnuPG Key ID: A79A45668240AB6C







--Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA++tWUp5pFZoJAq2wRAiDwAJ0W3zGOzruSZJxZoCG9XkbBJTexLgCg54Ja
JK21bmZLAfxt3JHn2ThqaHA=
=Y7Dq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV--