Re: Gentoo Linux into the future
Zack Gilburd <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jun 2003 04:14:28 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.sysadmin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 June 2003 03:46 am, Wade Mealing wrote: > > I think that making Gentoo more organized is a very good ide. As the > > number of Gentoo users grow so dose the number of Gentoo server. As a > > Gentoo user I fell fine. But a sysadmin has other needs then the user. > > In my experience a sysadmin has the following needs: > > 1. Time. Especially in the privet sector you can't spend days on end > > setting up a server. > > Very good point, although this is how im doing it in the field at the > moment, i have some basic roll-outs that i've built, but these arn't > public and I cant afford to hose them. I think that drobbins' post about this to the GDML really puts the foot dow= n=20 about organization and accountablility. > > 2. Stability. We have to trust that the packets that we emerge are > > stable enough for our production servers. Testing them out ourselves > > takes to much time (ref point number one) > > True, maybe we could setup another profile for the GSP ? (Jumping ahead > of this mail there maybe) Stablity is a HUGE factor. Perhaps if you have a gentoo server profile=20 selected and you emerge -p a package, i an extra field would be present for= =20 rating the stability.... Example: *** emerge -p postfix These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N 5 ] net-mail/postfix-2.0.12-r1 *** Where 5 would be the most stable and 1 would be the least. > > 3. Other security needs. We need secure systems but without loosing too > > much user friendliness. > > Another good point, although we are starting from a good base system, > security and user-friendly ness dont usually go hand in hand. Perhaps another field in emerge -p? I am sure something could be figured o= ut=20 for emerge -s, too. > > I also want to ask Klieber if he would like to represent the Gentoo > > server community as he is already a top level developer. He is already a > > frequent user of the #gentoo-server and a dam good linux Gentoo user, > > sysadmin, developer. He has both the skill and the knowledge to do the > > job. > > No challenges here. AFAIK, klieber is against the idea of gentoo-server becoming too high on th= e=20 agenda. I don't see why we wouldn't need carpaski just to implement the=20 above emerge -p stuff, alone. I hope this helps, Regards klasikahl, Gentoo's youngest (?) sysadmin of a production server. (I am 15= =2E) =20 Perhaps also the youngest person to ever obtain a Linux+ certification?=20 <http://tehunlose.com/images/linux+cert.jpg> I am still looking for proof = of=20 the latter. :) =2D-=20 Zack Gilburd http://tehunlose.com GnuPG Key ID: A79A45668240AB6C --Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA++tWUp5pFZoJAq2wRAiDwAJ0W3zGOzruSZJxZoCG9XkbBJTexLgCg54Ja JK21bmZLAfxt3JHn2ThqaHA= =Y7Dq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_UWt+++QP5aWuTCV--