Re: Gentoo Linux into the future

Wade Mealing <[email protected]> 26 Jun 2003 20:46:30 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.sysadmin
Message-ID <1056624389.25275.25.camel@twins>
--=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Nice mail, just my $0.02c, I havn't had long to digest all this, but
here are my thoughts so far.  My mind my change.

> I think that making Gentoo more organized is a very good ide. As the
> number of Gentoo users grow so dose the number of Gentoo server. As a
> Gentoo user I fell fine. But a sysadmin has other needs then the user.
> In my experience a sysadmin has the following needs:
> 1. Time. Especially in the privet sector you can't spend days on end
> setting up a server.

Very good point, although this is how im doing it in the field at the
moment, i have some basic roll-outs that i've built, but these arn't
public and I cant afford to hose them.

> 2. Stability. We have to trust that the packets that we emerge are
> stable enough for our production servers. Testing them out ourselves
> takes to much time (ref point number one)

True, maybe we could setup another profile for the GSP  ? (Jumping ahead
of this mail there maybe)

> 3. Other security needs. We need secure systems but without loosing too
> much user friendliness.

Another good point, although we are starting from a good base system,
security and user-friendly ness dont usually go hand in hand.

>=20
> I also want to ask Klieber if he would like to represent the Gentoo
> server community as he is already a top level developer. He is already a
> frequent user of the #gentoo-server and a dam good linux Gentoo user,
> sysadmin, developer. He has both the skill and the knowledge to do the
> job.=20

No challenges here.

>=20
> The goal of this discussion should be to com up with a unified response
> from the Gentoo server community to the new structure.
>=20
> This is my point of view and I would like to here your comments on it.
> Please feel free to add some points if you like.=20
>=20
> For:
> 1. A Gentoo sysadmin and server environment has other needs then you
> average Gentoo user and we have to make sure that this is also considers
> when decisions for the future and structure of Gentoo is taken.
>=20
> 2
> . Linux is a server based os.
>=20
> Against:
> 1. We should not isolate us form the other Gentoo users (we are also
> users :) )We should not involve ourselves in any form of groupism.
>=20

Can you clarify what you mean by that ?

> 2. The top level development tree should be as short as possible. Maybe
> we should make a sub project of Gentoo-alt. If so would this ensure that
> the Gentoo server related issues were properly represented at the top
> level? Please give comments/suggestions to this point.
>=20
>=20
> WorkTooMutch
> "I never make any typos, all my e-mails are encrypted."=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
>=20

--=20
Wade Mealing

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
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3D
=3DvmcB
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


--=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA++s8FMZKp3YKC83ARAvimAJ918qfu9maRTKJAkFIXu2pe9wFuMACfcSzr
RulUiGibi3ll1x6DW9jiLOU=
=YS01
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc--