Re: Gentoo Linux into the future
Wade Mealing <[email protected]> 26 Jun 2003 20:46:30 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.sysadmin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1056624389.25275.25.camel@twins> |
--=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nice mail, just my $0.02c, I havn't had long to digest all this, but here are my thoughts so far. My mind my change. > I think that making Gentoo more organized is a very good ide. As the > number of Gentoo users grow so dose the number of Gentoo server. As a > Gentoo user I fell fine. But a sysadmin has other needs then the user. > In my experience a sysadmin has the following needs: > 1. Time. Especially in the privet sector you can't spend days on end > setting up a server. Very good point, although this is how im doing it in the field at the moment, i have some basic roll-outs that i've built, but these arn't public and I cant afford to hose them. > 2. Stability. We have to trust that the packets that we emerge are > stable enough for our production servers. Testing them out ourselves > takes to much time (ref point number one) True, maybe we could setup another profile for the GSP ? (Jumping ahead of this mail there maybe) > 3. Other security needs. We need secure systems but without loosing too > much user friendliness. Another good point, although we are starting from a good base system, security and user-friendly ness dont usually go hand in hand. >=20 > I also want to ask Klieber if he would like to represent the Gentoo > server community as he is already a top level developer. He is already a > frequent user of the #gentoo-server and a dam good linux Gentoo user, > sysadmin, developer. He has both the skill and the knowledge to do the > job.=20 No challenges here. >=20 > The goal of this discussion should be to com up with a unified response > from the Gentoo server community to the new structure. >=20 > This is my point of view and I would like to here your comments on it. > Please feel free to add some points if you like.=20 >=20 > For: > 1. A Gentoo sysadmin and server environment has other needs then you > average Gentoo user and we have to make sure that this is also considers > when decisions for the future and structure of Gentoo is taken. >=20 > 2 > . Linux is a server based os. >=20 > Against: > 1. We should not isolate us form the other Gentoo users (we are also > users :) )We should not involve ourselves in any form of groupism. >=20 Can you clarify what you mean by that ? > 2. The top level development tree should be as short as possible. Maybe > we should make a sub project of Gentoo-alt. If so would this ensure that > the Gentoo server related issues were properly represented at the top > level? Please give comments/suggestions to this point. >=20 >=20 > WorkTooMutch > "I never make any typos, all my e-mails are encrypted."=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > [email protected] mailing list >=20 --=20 Wade Mealing -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) mQGiBD7i1ZERBADCvbqoF7AwJscAVwwuiSChUARce86wwP0lF5QxboPfM6KdUAvc 1BCkKFjyBT6ElJFngtY1mxMIClJBx/Lb0VuwjxxpizR+OTYw92BZe/z3l47rNtCu 1vfHQiyKeesPzJ3AkoFlc6vXZy6jOVfL0BFQpuTZPj9JE0OKIxyXI9+YNwCggky0 wQbOse3XEdIW9pRrCnXg8LUEAKANBiFCusKhELU4AQHQ7dhyWKr3RWZqeKBIyUKB NjE4FUJdbrbmqMPH00dQstIOOjoQFkKpiZLivlMdo0Kp3a4BviYOZoZDd1nfUzwi CZOGmIHR9XY4nsPmJV9pjV2hSK4tjFOVgMeKwasu/Sq94AlidtbeTsKMtTTjoyVG iWhAA/kB2h4qI04cZyWI3pUjFT9WgAEk3ktCZ4AMFjYiNW5KsZ8GOqIRIZMhEo28 sZehLP9tDc/U0qOlVC1MdTLRNVYg98OUV0LN34WxuqdtIXCLX9/0zr8pO2GyfbvT vRyf2ZzKW2I9zocoGVI2e1jbFOIfRrpX3aOqJUdB+CILtOrUH7Q5V2FkZSBNZWFs aW5nICh3d3cuc3VidmVydGVkLm5ldCkgPHdtZWFsaW5nQHN1YnZlcnRlZC5uZXQ+ iGEEExECACEFAj7i1ZEFCQPFCgAGCwkIBwMCAxUCAwMWAgECHgECF4AACgkQMZKp 3YKC83Ar0wCcDkwGaPuTOJf9xb8+R4FYu/NsrGoAn3ZeyKisaPpj5X8pd27PRVfD f4pduQENBD7i1ZgQBADgDjr6EXjCh46TAXuLlyDJSLmPnERYTiJrFooEd/Y+zQx8 VG5fz4wnMTLhZSD57SXi544+v8k0R1NyvD17PbnP6u5kiDhHF1OyMmljsFQRhay7 P7oAUKzG27GviD3azTb1wXr9+D0zbKenyFItjIjoo6RUPum00O9DmHp8ZR+lJwAD BwP/ebgjv9NvIALQXt++dhWzJiqQzuRxMS4V0J8bFBbrDrgQTif0ecTlGjLlKJbc +XgfqxeflpyX1HekteC8uOEJSOPtWqk1y/52+7H+Usfo5hRi4LW6YGCCSqoW9Pm+ uAsFACegnzgoC3ZyTRDxOrqvIE/3nPIfEu11hcK73iXR/U2ITAQYEQIADAUCPuLV mAUJA8UKAAAKCRAxkqndgoLzcKBQAJ0Udi9R34fqjH6Gf5lgY4iOpcLFiACffj0W TvviS8Dwgd+n4LNCrHRDerw=3D =3DvmcB -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA++s8FMZKp3YKC83ARAvimAJ918qfu9maRTKJAkFIXu2pe9wFuMACfcSzr RulUiGibi3ll1x6DW9jiLOU= =YS01 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vP239HZyvIEGFSQxVKGc--