Re: Re: Manual line breaks in emails
Dale <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Mar 2026 20:43:25 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/28/26 7:53 PM, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 3/28/26 4:19 PM, Dale wrote: >> I set mailnews.display.disable_format_flowed_support to true and that >> makes it wrap in the message pane no matter how wide the pane is. > That's the behavior that I'm used to. > >> When I narrow the message pane, it also narrows the pane with subject, >> email and all that. That pane I need to stay the same. > Fair enough. I can appreciate that. > > You can also open the message to read in a new window and get the same > reflowing effect when re-sizing that message window. > >> It took me a while to get that just right. Now I have the massage >> pane like I want as well, wrapped and not wide. The part I'm typing >> is wide but I can likely deal with that. At least I can read messages >> without hurting my neck so much. Saves wear on my chair as sometimes >> I have to twist it around some. > :-) > >> Wrapping in the composer part would be nice but I'm hoping my change >> above doesn't affect what you receive tho. > I believe that the message composition window will soft wrap at > approximately the number of characters set. But the lines will be > unwrapped / re-wrapped when displayed. > > You should be able to save the message as a draft and view what it will > look like in the Drafts folder. > >> Does this message look the same to you on your end? If it changes, >> well, need to find a new plan. ;-) > The message that I'm replying to looks like it used format=flowed correctly. That's the big thing right there. I want it to be correct on the other end for whoever receives the messages I send. I want it wrapped here but others may not. I'd like to have it like I want it here but they to have it like they want it there. This seems to be the case so I'm a happy camper. > >> :-) :-) > :-) > >> P. S. I just recently switched to Thunderbird from Seamonkey. So this >> is a fairly new setup with a new user. > Fair enough. > > I believe that both Thunderbird and Seamonkey share a fair bit of > lineage back to Netscape Composer in the '90s. I'm not sure how far > they have diverged from each other. I know that they have diverged from > each other some. There is some similarity but Thunderbird is a lot more advanced if you will. It has been updated a lot more with new features. Seamonkey seems to be having a slow death. Very slow. It is a really nice tool but it needs to do like Firefox did ages ago and do a complete rewrite to work better on the newer hardware and most importantly, be compatible with the new Firefox add-ons. Most of the add-ons I had on Seamonkey have not been updated since Firefox changed the way add-ons are done. Firefox got there's updated to the new way but Seamonkey and its add-on method was left behind. I'll also say that a lot of websites no longer worked on Seamonkey. It is a big reason for me switching to Firefox for web browsing. I'd never go to a financial site or even a site that I order with that stores my card info with Seamonkey. I might would browse a website while not logged in but that's it. If I needed to be logged in, I'd switch to Firefox. So, I'm sending emails in a way that allows people to adjust how it is seen on their end and I can view it on my end the way I like. I'm glad I said something now. I thought this would never exist and turns out, it existed for ages. ROFL I spend to much time in my garden. Which is where I will be tomorrow. I got tomato plants that are getting to tall to fit under my grow lights. I raised my lights as high as they can go but they still all up in the lights. Thanks much. I like this better. Dale :-) :-)