Re: Keepassxc hard masked, why ?

Il 14/04/26 14:05, Michael ha scritto:
> On Tuesday, 14 April 2026 12:22:54 British Summer Time Philipp Ludwig
> wrote:
>> I am tempted to fork keepassxc and port it to Qt6, but first I try to
>> workaround these problems.
> 
> You could try testing app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1 which works
> on Qt6, according to this notice:
I'm not familiar with missing keywords, I've done the following:

# cat /etc/portage/package.unmask/keepassxc
=app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1

# cat /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/keepassxc
app-admin/keepassxc ~amd64 amd64

# emerge -1p =app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1
==app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
Dependency resolution took 0.80 s (backtrack: 0/20).


!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy 
"=app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your 
request:
- app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1::gentoo (masked by: missing 
keyword)

What am I missing?

thanks,

raffaele