Re: Keepassxc hard masked, why ?
Michael <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:05:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1956631.tdWV9SEqCh@rogueboard> |
On Tuesday, 14 April 2026 12:22:54 British Summer Time Philipp Ludwig wrote: > The reasoning behind the mask is sound, but the issue with the > alternatives is > that they do not replace keepassxc 100%; app-admin/keepass crashes > when you try > to open a file, and it can't open databases that have an empty > password (and this is what I am dealing with as an export from some > obscure tool I > need to use at work). > kpcli is also mentioned as an alternative, but that can't import V4 > databases. > > I am tempted to fork keepassxc and port it to Qt6, but first I try to > workaround these problems. You could try testing app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1 which works on Qt6, according to this notice: "!!! The following installed packages are masked: - app-admin/keepassxc-2.7.11-r2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) /var/db/repos/gentoo/profiles/package.mask: # Andreas Sturmlechner <[email protected]> (2026-04-12) # Perpetually stuck on Qt5 despite recent releases made under the # influence of AI. A Qt6-based snapshot is provided for testing without # keywords, currently as app-admin/keepassxc-2.8.0_pre260316-r1, but it # is unclear when keywords will be restored let alone stabilised. # Alternatives are app-admin/keepass, app-admin/pass which can import # kbdx files, app-admin/vaultwarden, app-admin/bitwarden-desktop-bin and # probably many more. AppImage or Flatpak versions also available as # last resort. # Bugs #949231, #967905. # Removal on 2026-05-11." > Am 2026-04-14 12:41, schrieb Michael: > > On Tuesday, 14 April 2026 11:05:14 British Summer Time Jacques > > Montier> > > wrote: > >> Hello, all, > >> > >> This morning, i see keepassxc became hard masked. > > > > Yes, it was masked two days ago. > > > >> Is any reason for that as i used this soft for years ? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> -- > >> Jacques > > > > Upstream have not put in the work to make it compatible with Qt6 and > > its > > maintenance is now apparently relying on AI contributions. There > > are > > alternatives to consider, as mentioned here: > > > > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/keepassxc
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJPBAABCAA5FiEEXqhvaVh2ERicA8Ceseqq9sKVZxkFAmneLY8bFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyAAoJELHqqvbClWcZi6QP/AkPLsEn8xAB78aTcqGs 7JhYXvvdxKP+cc/8lbnFNRSzlJS+5a+2nS3V3hu1zqTYMNI6TgIHBfec2mvhHl6C Y99L9ZlaZ3rPCFYUpQMK6xfIx1dSY7Cm/L4S803xaiBD8AJRcg254wCXDmQBuf40 QUAH6oMBRIRBIVamtI0+hPdOWoqMLHEAJIJjYXi7of87RSU+lEEfsA4DYHE2/toI 84ewYYaJNHJUNoX/BAYAHM55GkgXLrggc8WylmK2vKEH0qijuus1nS2GJoCAq6An wKhNljKqg1WkPmrbQgbGNGeYgmx2qmiCTjIxNaELEzKWKEGkQEGz/epTMLKX3jwf vVbF3/X+rCEGGx8CyUfb6hSV03wvGQ2/wg1hBxAyqutL5+p0tuEHwoLLg2scszjC 8Gkky7pKiG9GG/DKZS3mAIJrxHGnG3AtVYgdeZhje3ns167WYSE7iWNaYupx2Wy6 uYB1i0yKJH/ACtp6bUhGW+y1ka9HBkNTcOOosdrl8xUuCIErwIo+mYmkcFYu0fn8 S8bMOhsEqSuzVSBVLQhrQzUrITmbeKu6Lw2P66QrFQvRRtBiQZaPQdpzDGNkjvB4 +u4J9L4+i9q/tGztXsh4dbkXtAa4uCejcqOhMxjDCo3vgQ2bTyBcnxpmHkwt8Rj+ /RlcbCiKNmDJycUmUu91XH56 =1z6c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----