Re: Agilent 82357B repeatable hard failure

Hi Dave,

Thanks again for all of your efforts in debugging this problem.  I have
enjoyed working with you.

I like setting ATN from the end of the read function.  I think this 
works well for
the normal case where we send a query and get a reply.
I would avoid duplicating code and call the agilent_82357_take_control 
function.

I see a balance between  the chance that setting ATN might break 
something against
knowing that having a  correct ibsta() value will fix something.

Jim Houston



On 9/29/23 04:58, dave penkler wrote:
> Thanks - all the runs look good except of course the R&S NRVD.
> @Jim - the IBEOS ioctl failed could be due to a set-bin=1 option for 
> the board in your gpib.conf file.
>            The agilent_82357 does not support 8 bit compares.
> What is the general opinion as to whether the ATN workaround should be 
> pushed to the SVN ?
> -Dave
>



_______________________________________________
Linux-gpib-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general