Re: Solved Interrupt Problem with PGC-GR290K
"Kimbrell, Roy" <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:11:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.hardware.sony |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So you discovered that running the latest stable kernel, with the latest > ACPI patch that was made for this kernel, would work. I'm sorry to say > that's the very first thing you should have tried. I wouldn't even have > imagined someone could post about any problem on this list before trying > this first, evident kernel configuration. Yeah, I hear you. But this is how a newbie learns. I struggled with the RedHat source for awhile, figuring it was my problem that the patches couldn't be applied. > > Since the day the ACPI patch was available, I have *always* been running > the latest stable kernel with the latest ACPI patch that was made for > it. And it always worked, and worked better each time. Why would the > kernel and ACPI developers work, if not to solve our problems? > Well, I will too, now. > >>PS about APIC. When it came up it said that the APIC had been >>disabled by the BIOS (now why would it do that?), and APIC had >>re-enabled it. Interesting. > > > Same here. It seems that on recent kernels+acpi versions, enabling APIC > is required in order to have ACPI working. This wasn't the case earlier. > And for me too, at boot time it is said that the BIOS had disabled the > APIC and that it would be re-enabled. I don't know what it means, but it > works OK like that. Well, there's another reason I couldn't get ACIP working, then. I didn't know ACPI required APIC. I call the method I use to solve problems "Superstition and Ignorance." I try things in a semi-scientific way and futz around till they work. That's what happened here - and that's what took so long. Regards, Roy