[tlinux-users:08852] Re: P105-9722 issues..
"Ionut Ciocirlan" <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:18:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.hardware.toshiba |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/30/08, Thomas Charron <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 7:13 AM, bestonnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- "Renato S. Yamane" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why Toshiba don't provide datas to developers make > > > drivers compatible with most products? > > A lot of data for the Toshiba developed BIOS has been > > released. > > Releasing data for the Phoenix BIOS is probably out of > > Toshiba's hands (since they don't own it the best they > > could do would be try to convince Phoenix to release the > > data). > > Several things here. They do not need to release technical > specifications for the BIOS. The definitions of hardware components > within the BIOS, which in many cases, are just plain *wrong*, could be > either A) Provided so it can be fixed by others, or B) Umm. Fixed! > :-D Talk about wrong: after decompiling the DSDT, I found the important parts of the _BCL, _BCM, and _BQC methods to be all wrapped inside a "If (LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6))". Basically what that means is that LCD brightness query and control is only available to ms vista. After fixing that crap, surprise, I have a working /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness Not of much use for me anyway, since the Fn brightness keys work, and I barely use powersave profiles, but it does get you wondering... what do those engineers have for brains? Or rather... does the fact that Phoenix and MS are holding hands turn into explicit disabling of basic ACPI functionality for other OSs? If that's the case, I bet the EU court would squeeze out another couple hundred million dollars from the both of them (but unlike MS, Phoenix won't be able to survive that -- which would be better for all of us (rant over :) )) John