RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.

Hi  Guys !!!
    
    Thanks for your time, info and reply to the message... 
 
    I will try doing it with mode= Round robin. And also thanks for share your experience..... 
 
    With the best. ! 
 
 
 
Euriel, 
 

 -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Christian B. Ellsworth Capo
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.



I gotta say that we use 3 LB using UM, and all off them use Bonding driver, but in our configuracion they all use the bonding mode=active-backup,  we haven't tried with other modes of bonding, but so far the activebackup works flawlessly... and you don't need anything special on the switches.
 
We use bonding to have a switch/NIC fault tolerant solution.
 
My 2c's
 
k.ellsworth
 
 

  _____  

De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de Terry, Jason
Enviado el: Lunes, 24 de Julio de 2006 15:17
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.



Yes, it works great with bonding.

 

I remember there used to be a problem with arptables having a direct reference to eth0 but I think that has been fixed, if not simply change it in the batch file.

 


  _____  


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Euriel Gómez Raga
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ultramonkey and Bonding.

 

 

 

    Hi there... does anyone has worked with Bonding interfaces  ( bond0, bond0:0, bond0:1 ... etc.. ) and UM. does the ARP issue can be driven with arptables_jf ?

 

    Does anyone is working with this ?...

 

 

    Thanks in advanced.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Euriel Gómez Raga.