RE: Limit of LVS NAT
"Timan Rebel / Sugababes.nl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We are also using 2 Dell 1850 servers (dual Xeon and 1gb RAM and it is eating out of his nose) and we are using NAT for, I think, 30 servers. (Being 24 php-file webservers and 6 static-file webservers). We have spikes going up to 225mbit/s. I can't imagine it is a hard limit. We have not tweaked the configuration, besides adaptive round robin (the server is telling the director how much weight he can assign). Changing to LVS-DR should not be a big problem if a problem arises with the bandwith ________________________________________ Dear All, Really ultramonkey is working well with RHEL v4 (kernel 2.6.9) in my cluster environment.... My question is what's the exteme limit of LVS NAT How many real servers it can support.How much throughput it can deliver. How much it's connection limit, how can i increase maximum connections. As i read the document in linuxvirtualserver.org , LVS NAT works fine in around 20 real servers. But what would be happened if i add more than 30 real servers in cluster. is it hard limit or what ? , because i am using medium range server(dell poweredge 1850) with Gbit switch , so network should not be bottleneck. even director's configuration is dual P-4 2.4 Ghz processor with 4 GB RAM. To improve the efficiency of director what should i do, like increasing socket window size , MTU value of NIC ? Your experience will help me Regards Ritesh Agrawal -- Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body: unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected] where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.