Re: Corosync 1 -> 2
Digimer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/10/14 10:40 AM, Greg Woods wrote: > I notice that the "network:ha-clustering:Stable" repo for CentOS 6 now > contains Corosync 2.3.3-1 . I am currently running 1.4.1-17 . Is it safe to > just run this update? Are there configuration changes I have to make in > order for the new version to work? (If there is a document or wiki page > describing how to convert from Corosync 1 to 2, I would be happy to be > pointed to it). > > Thanks, > --Greg Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside of production first. Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman. I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is. If you really want a corosync v2+, then I would recommend switching to CentOS 7. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems