Re: Corosync 1 -> 2

Digimer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 01/10/14 10:40 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> I notice that the "network:ha-clustering:Stable" repo for CentOS 6 now
> contains Corosync 2.3.3-1 . I am currently running 1.4.1-17 . Is it safe to
> just run this update? Are there configuration changes I have to make in
> order for the new version to work? (If there is a document or wiki page
> describing how to convert from Corosync 1 to 2, I would be happy to be
> pointed to it).
>
> Thanks,
> --Greg

Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test 
outside of production first.

Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, 
it became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I 
heard upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + 
cman. I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean 
that the corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is.

If you really want a corosync v2+, then I would recommend switching to 
CentOS 7.

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.