Re: Corosync 1 -> 2
Greg Woods <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKhxXfYSFgE6rBhJggX0+M1BwTQZ0S05pL=Dj8jX+oMrbY9+yg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside > of production first. > Of course, I would always do that anyway, even without a major version number change. > > Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it > became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard > upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman. There is a pacemaker update too, to 1.1.12+git20140723.483f48a-1.1 I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the > corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is. > OK, thanks. What I am really trying to figure out is exactly what the network_ha-clustering_Stable repo is for. Presumably, from the name, they wouldn't put anything in there that isn't ready for production? --Greg _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems