Re: Corosync 1 -> 2
Digimer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/10/14 03:58 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >> Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside >> of production first. >> > > Of course, I would always do that anyway, even without a major version > number change. > >> >> Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it >> became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard >> upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman. > > > There is a pacemaker update too, to 1.1.12+git20140723.483f48a-1.1 > > I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the >> corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is. >> > > OK, thanks. What I am really trying to figure out is exactly what the > network_ha-clustering_Stable repo is for. Presumably, from the name, they > wouldn't put anything in there that isn't ready for production? > > --Greg Who runs the repo? It's not a name I am familiar with. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems