mISDNuser patch discussion?
Christoph Schulz <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 06:50:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20170210065026.Horde.tZjdjRX_ncJkeM8JIJAws1V@localhost> |
Hello, I'm Christoph Schulz, and I am developing for the fli4l project, a router distribution (mostly) for PC-like hardware (see http://www.fli4l.de/ for details). Traditionally, as the users of fli4l come mostly from Germany, ISDN was an important technology fli4l had to support. Although the need for ISDN has decreased in the past years, there are still users who use ISDN a) as a fallback in case DSL does not work (for whatever reason), i.e. PPP-over-ISDN, and/or b) for sending/receiving faxes. (There are more use cases, but these two are the most important ones.) As the i4l subsystem in the Linux kernel has been deprecated for years (there was even a proposal to move the i4l core to staging in early 2016), I took the challenge and tried to integrate mISDN into fli4l. For the last two weeks, I have configured and tested the various use cases (PPP, fax), using mISDN hardware drivers and the mISDN user-space tools together with pppd and capiplugin. In this time, I found some mISDNcapid and isdn4linux shortcomings which I was able to fix such that PPP and fax work flawlessly in client and server mode with mISDN as CAPI layer. My question is: Is this mailing list the right place to discuss my mISDN patches? Or is there a dedicated mISDN mailing list? Best regards, Christoph Schulz _______________________________________________ isdn4linux mailing list [email protected] https://www.isdn4linux.de/mailman/listinfo/isdn4linux
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlidVKEACgkQL11jCnyQ5Ow3GACdE2SugbC5/RvREfSRUt4ibbW/ zAAAnjZKG7zyDx3pjNRiMyBezSHCoSff =K6Rz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----