Re: mISDNuser patch discussion?

Karsten Keil <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:32:20 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Christoph,

Am 10.02.2017 um 06:50 schrieb Christoph Schulz:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm Christoph Schulz, and I am developing for the fli4l project, a
> router distribution (mostly) for PC-like hardware (see
> http://www.fli4l.de/ for details). Traditionally, as the users of fli4l
> come mostly from Germany, ISDN was an important technology fli4l had to
> support. Although the need for ISDN has decreased in the past years,
> there are still users who use ISDN a) as a fallback in case DSL does not
> work (for whatever reason), i.e. PPP-over-ISDN, and/or b) for
> sending/receiving faxes. (There are more use cases, but these two are
> the most important ones.)
> 
> As the i4l subsystem in the Linux kernel has been deprecated for years
> (there was even a proposal to move the i4l core to staging in early
> 2016), I took the challenge and tried to integrate mISDN into fli4l. For
> the last two weeks, I have configured and tested the various use cases
> (PPP, fax), using mISDN hardware drivers and the mISDN user-space tools
> together with pppd and capiplugin. In this time, I found some mISDNcapid
> and isdn4linux shortcomings which I was able to fix such that PPP and
> fax work flawlessly in client and server mode with mISDN as CAPI layer.
> 
> My question is: Is this mailing list the right place to discuss my mISDN
> patches? Or is there a dedicated mISDN mailing list?
> 

Yes it is the right place, feel free to post patches here.

Karsten