Re: mISDNuser patch discussion?
Karsten Keil <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:32:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Christoph, Am 10.02.2017 um 06:50 schrieb Christoph Schulz: > Hello, > > I'm Christoph Schulz, and I am developing for the fli4l project, a > router distribution (mostly) for PC-like hardware (see > http://www.fli4l.de/ for details). Traditionally, as the users of fli4l > come mostly from Germany, ISDN was an important technology fli4l had to > support. Although the need for ISDN has decreased in the past years, > there are still users who use ISDN a) as a fallback in case DSL does not > work (for whatever reason), i.e. PPP-over-ISDN, and/or b) for > sending/receiving faxes. (There are more use cases, but these two are > the most important ones.) > > As the i4l subsystem in the Linux kernel has been deprecated for years > (there was even a proposal to move the i4l core to staging in early > 2016), I took the challenge and tried to integrate mISDN into fli4l. For > the last two weeks, I have configured and tested the various use cases > (PPP, fax), using mISDN hardware drivers and the mISDN user-space tools > together with pppd and capiplugin. In this time, I found some mISDNcapid > and isdn4linux shortcomings which I was able to fix such that PPP and > fax work flawlessly in client and server mode with mISDN as CAPI layer. > > My question is: Is this mailing list the right place to discuss my mISDN > patches? Or is there a dedicated mISDN mailing list? > Yes it is the right place, feel free to post patches here. Karsten