Re: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try

Jason Corley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.jpackage.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Interested people with a rhel4 based client  (Scientific Linux,
CentOS, etc.) please test against our main mirror (dotsrc) and see if
it's fixed.
Jason

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Jason Corley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Peter,
> Thank you for taking the time to actually answer my questions instead
> of simply responding with another "me too" and asking that it be fixed
> like every other responder in this thread. I think I might have found
> the problem, will send out a follow-up later today.
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Peter Slizik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This should have been fixed already... Have you run yum clean all and
>>> retried?
>>> Jason
>>
>> it neither works for me. I hope this will be resolved soon. Yesterday
>> evening I caught myself singing "No more mirrors to try" to the tune "No
>> woman, no cry".
>>
>>
>> On 04/08/2010 07:31 PM, Jason Corley wrote:
>>> oooh, 4.x... hrm all of my tests are on 5.x systems (centos). out of
>>> curiosity, what is the yum version there?
>>
>> Scientific Linux 4.7
>> # yum --version
>> 2.4.3
>>
>> The same version is used in Scientific Linux 4.8.
>>
>> The packages provided by this Scientific Linux distribution are so
>> desperately old...
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>  this particular error is not
>>>
>>> showing up on my 5.x clients, making me think it's another checksum
>>> support issue.
>>>
>>> For reference, these problems are because the version of yum,
>>> createrepo, etc. on our server is newer than what is available in
>>> rhel5.x, and has a default checksum value that rhel5.x yum, etc. do
>>> not even support (sha256). My suspicion is that we'll have to rev back
>>> to an even earlier checksum style for 4.x support, but I'll have to
>>> look into it.
>>>
>>> Are all the people reporting problems on a RHEL 4.x variant, or are
>>> people still seeing problems on 5.x systems as well?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> JPackage-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.