gmane.linux.jpackage.general

15280 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: broken RPM for Centos5
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:32:33 +0200
Xavier Poinsard <[email protected]> • #15370
broken RPM for Centos5
Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:27:29 +0200
Xavier Poinsard <[email protected]> • #15369
jpackage repo broken / mirrors
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:18:38 +1200
Vladimir Mencl <vladimir.mencl-F+z8Qja7x9Xokq/[email protected]> • #15368
unsigned packages - again
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:53:52 +1200
Vladimir Mencl <vladimir.mencl-F+z8Qja7x9Xokq/[email protected]> • #15367
unsigned packages
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:53:43 +0000
Richard Newton <Richard.Newton-xM16eKyGSYBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #15366
unsigned packages
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:53:43 +0000
Richard Newton <Richard.Newton-xM16eKyGSYBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #15365
Re: [centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:45:21 +0200
Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> • #15364
Re: [centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:20:50 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15363
[centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:43:14 +0200
Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> • #15362
Re: jpackage-utils from jpackage-5.0-generic does not work with java-1.7.0-openjdk
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:15:53 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #15361
jpackage-utils from jpackage-5.0-generic does not work with java-1.7.0-openjdk
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:02:22 +0000 (UTC)
Tomas Lestach <[email protected]> • #15360
Re: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:07:47 -0400 (EDT)
Andrew Hughes <[email protected]> • #15359
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:37:40 +0200
Jacob Wisor <[email protected]> • #15358
Re: apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:21:25 +0200
john <[email protected]> • #15357
Re: apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15356
apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:14:21 +0200
john <[email protected]> • #15355
jpackage.org website issues
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:05:17 -0400
Jeff Bachtel <[email protected]> • #15354
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15353
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:25:13 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15352
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:03:36 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15351
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:53:36 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15350
A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15349
Re: [JPackage-announce] [RPM (6.0)] maven-plugin-tools3-3.2-2.jpp6
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:57:09 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15348
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15346
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:06:54 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15345
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15344
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15343
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 00:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15342
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15341
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 00:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15340
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 6 Apr 2013 00:10:38 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15339
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:08:03 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15338
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 4 Apr 2013 00:07:56 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15337
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 3 Apr 2013 00:08:15 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15336
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15335
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15334
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:07:43 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15333
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:07:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15332
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:08:16 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15331
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:08:08 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15330
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:34 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15329
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:08:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15328
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:07:14 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15327
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 00:08:30 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15326
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:08:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15325
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:10:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15324
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:08:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15323
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:08:27 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15322
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:08:50 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15321
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:07:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15320