Re: Tomcat update

paul s <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.jpackage.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>> Please ask on the jpackage-discuss list as I am no longer contributing

:-( so sad... thank you for this brilliant contribution it is 
appreciated highly...

>> Does anyone know of any reason why we should not upgrade to 6.0.28 due

none that i am aware of. we are on 26 over here and notice that there is 
7 coming just around the corner. i can contribute some time to this as i 
think it is pressing.

the other concern would be what is going to happen to the java spec.

>> Sorry for just making a request. Is there any chance of upgrading the

well peeps, looks like we are going to have to do this ourselves. hi-ho!

i took a look at the src rpm and checked how the source was being laid 
out as well as changing the spec to build. i don't think that i swapped 
the right libraries as tomcat started up saying it was still 26 after 
building the rpms.

however my vote is tomcat-6.0.29 & tomcat-7.0.2 as they are the most 
current.

cheers
paul



On 10/08/2010 08:43 AM, Will Tatam wrote:
>
> On 07/10/10 13:18, Jason Corley wrote:
>> Please ask on the jpackage-discuss list as I am no longer contributing
>> to the jpackage project. If it's important someone else will push the
>> update.
>> Jason
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Joel Stobart<joel-GuloQ8L/[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> Sorry for just making a request. Is there any chance of upgrading the
>>> version of tomcat6 on jpackage to the latest version.
>>>
>>> There is a vulnerability
>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html#Fixed_in_Apache_Tomcat_6.0.28 which
>>> is fixed in 6.0.28.
>>>
>>> Is there any other way to upgrade?
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> Joel Stobart
>>>
>>>
>>
> Does anyone know of any reason why we should not upgrade to 6.0.28 due
> to any kind of dependency issue ?
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.