[Bug 359] New: Why should a binary rpm have to mess around with rpm configuration files ?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.jpackage.general
Message-ID <[email protected]/bugzilla/>
https://www.jpackage.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=359

           Summary: Why should a binary rpm have to mess around with rpm
                    configuration files ?
           Product: jpackage-utils
           Version: 5.0.0.1.jpp5
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: package
        AssignedTo: jpackage-discuss-/[email protected]
        ReportedBy: [email protected]


Comparing to version of the RPM, we found that jpackage-utils-5.0.0-1.jpp5 is
modifying an rpm config file in a postinstall script.
My enterprise is monitoring this file (/usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc) because of security
issues and I had to install another version of this package because of this,
which is considered as abnormal situation.
Why do you have to modified /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc?


[root@ce201 ~]#  rpm -q --scripts jpackage-utils-1.7.3-1jpp.2.el5
[root@ce201 ~]# 

While yours has:
[root@voatlas126 ~]# rpm -q --scripts jpackage-utils-5.0.0-1.jpp5
postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
  for i in "" /redhat /asianux; do
    i="/usr/lib/rpm$i/rpmrc"
    if test -f "$i" && egrep -q '^macrofiles:.*/etc/rpm/macros\.jpackage' "$i";
then
      perl -pi -e \
        's,^(macrofiles:.*):/etc/rpm/macros\.jpackage,$1,' "$i"
    fi
  done
fi

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.jpackage.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.