Re: Java 1.6.0_23

[My previous post got garbled by my mailer; re-sending as plain text].

There are a few missing symlinks in these spec files.

Here's an updated java-1.6.0-sun.spec -- I added the missing
"alternatives" under /usr/bin to Nico's version.

I think the -compat spec has the same problem, but I don't really use
that package, sorry.

BTW jdk update 24 is out.

D.

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Boris Folgmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've updated the spec file for 1.6.0_20 from Nico to build 1.6.0_23. Builds
> > fine on CentOS 5.5. I attached it for all of you and would appreciate if a
> > process could be established that ensures that updates like this make its
> > way to the yum repo.
>
> I've been behind on this, and need to renew my old effort to get on
> the CVS list for this package. RHEL 6, fortunately, has switched to
> openjdk. This saves a lot of packaging trouble.
>
> Here is the current set of necessary widgets to get JPackage release 5
> to play nicely on RHEL/CentOS 5. The java,-1.6..0-sun.spec  to
> incorporate the JDK tarballs from Oracle, the
> java-1.6.0-sun-compat.spec  package to work with the published JDK
> packages from Oracle, the current jpackage-utils-compat-el5.spec to
> resolve the RHEL 5 requirements and prevent it from trying to install
> RHEL 5's out of date components due to a missing RHEL dependency in
> the JDK RPM's from Oracle, and eclips-ecj.spec placeholder to get RHEL
> 5 to stop trying to obsolete the JPackage published "eclipse" package
> with the older "eclipse-ecj" from RHEL.
>
> _______________________________________________
> JPackage-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss

_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss