Re: jpackage.org offline
Adrien Kunysz <adk-z4cenUK/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.jpackage.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA4Z2ZQot97yi1RfAaSt6Qi0CN6FNv5rWMheLdtZUo4dciVUWA@mail.gmail.com> |
In my tests on CentOS 5, when I have only mirrorlist and jpackage.org is down, it breaks yum. When I add baseurl, you can still see the timeout/no route to host but it falls back to the working mirror and yum can proceed. Now that jpackage.org is back I haven't actually verified it uses it again but I would be surprised if it didn't. I agree that always using the official mirror list makes sense when it's available but having a fallback that doesn't involve manually tweaking your yum commandline or configuration would be nice (well, I have it deployed now but having it on by default could probably help other people next time it happens). On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Will Tatam <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/01/12 18:49, Adrien Kunysz wrote: >> Can you please consider the jpackage-release patch I posted earlier: >> https://www.zarb.org/pipermail/jpackage-discuss/2011-December/014796.html >> This should avoid yum breakage for all jpackage users next time >> jpackage.org goes down. >> > Is that what happens when you use baseurl and mirrorlist ? I though yum > expected use of either one or the other. > I keep the comment of the base url, in case people are behind a proxy > and so want to pin their downloads to our primary mirror rather than > using the full list of mirrors > > Please note that you should always be using dotsrc or the mirrorlist so > that an adding or removing of mirrors does not effect your systems. > jpackage.netmindz.net is currently disabled due to yum sending > unfriendly headers when requesting the repodata which is DOSing the > backend webservers rather than being delivered from the content delivery > servers > > -- > Will Tatam > >