Re: Ipv6 and preferred_lft

On 08/30/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Schouten wrote:
> I agree. I think that when you want the VIP-address to be the source of
> traffic, you could distinguish that by setting a netmask other than
> /128. Wouldn't that be a perfect solution? By default, a VIP is added as
> /128 with preferred_lft 0, with a netmask it is added as a normal address..

Bump this thread...

I tried to work around this by letting keepalived add the vips on lo,
but that fails misserably.

Is there a way that we can fix this?

-- 
Kerio Connect in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 09218193 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Keepalived-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/keepalived-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJNYz0ACgkQBJsbGZrWF/+tVACeIb+BUG63FSPLrjCI1baypSwC
V0cAn3g5ckTm3nVi5ZTvV7PKaQvqpJRJ
=kfzo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----