Re: Ipv6 and preferred_lft

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:29:49PM +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > I agree. I think that when you want the VIP-address to be the source of
> > traffic, you could distinguish that by setting a netmask other than
> > /128. Wouldn't that be a perfect solution? By default, a VIP is added as
> > /128 with preferred_lft 0, with a netmask it is added as a normal address..
> 
> Bump this thread...

I now opened a support ticket / feature request with Red Hat support
for this. Keepalived is still only a "tech preview" in RHEL, but
hopefully they'll be interested in solving it anyway.



  -jf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk