Re: Larger VRRP_MAX_VIP

Hi,

On 07.03.2014 05:58, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
> Hi, fellows:
> 
>     I have a LVS based system which has many VIPs, more than 20, but I
> found that the max amount of VIP are hardcoded to 20, so here's my
> questions:
> 
>     1. Why is that, what the initial intention was?
>     2. If I enlarge it by myself, would it cause any other problem?
> 
> Thanks for your responses :)

You can do two things

1. Use a virtual_ipaddress_excluded { ... } block.
2. Just add more ip's and keepalived will give an error during startup 
and it will fix it by itself. It will have the same effect as the 
virtual_ipaddress_excluded block but it is not as nice.

I do recommend using the 'use_vmac' option when doing this. I had a 
problem that the arp addresses of the ip's in the 
virtual_ipaddress_excluded block kept pointing to the old mac.

Greets,

Sander

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk