Re: AI slop (was Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: let special huge VMAs bypass the THP) policy check

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 6 Aug 2026, at 13:05, John Hubbard wrote:
>
> > On 8/6/26 9:50 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:45:17PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 04:47:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> >>>> Just to be clear: Unchecked AI slop in any form is making my life
> >>>> worse every day.
> >>>
> >>> I think eveyone's life who contributes reguarly to the kernel.. The
> >>> only ones who seem to benifit are people doing drive by patches!
> >>
> >> And they shouldn't - we should make sure that nobody doing this can
> >> benefit.
> > ...
> >>> Yet responsible use of AI seems genuinely helpful and quality improving :\
> >>
> >> Yes and I use it daily. It's really helpful when kept on a short leash...
> >
> > haha so true. A *very* short leash! :)

Very very :)

> >
> >>
> >> We're going to have to move to a trust model eventually IMO where random
> >> new people just don't get to apply anything until they build trust with
> >> smaller changes (and with measures for established people who start
> >> sloppping).
> >
> > That sounds like a good move! It really is all about who sends these patches,
> > and what their stance is toward creating patches.
> >
> > And furthermore, that's not even a change in policy! Because traditionally,
> > that's how people started anyway: with small patches and patience. It's

I should know, I did the Eudyptula challenge then stuff in the staging drivers
then I wrote a book etc. you know the usual stuff :P

It took years because it's you know a lot. And I still don't really understand
anything (therein lies the zen state of knowing enough to know ones own
incredible ignorance... :)

>
> Patience is the key. Seeing patches refreshed within a day is killing me.

Tell me about it :) the workslopload since the slopularity (circa
late 2025) is slopcrazy.

We so need some kind of a support group... maybe at LPC? :) I nominate the
pub as the venue for this...

>
> > only with AI that they've been able to skip that step, to everyone's
> > detriment.

Yeah. And also there are a number of people who, bless them, simply could
never get to the point of being able to contribute.

I really do think talent is a factor (I know for some this is a
controversial position) as well as bloody-mindedness, a certain way of
thinking about perhaps some masochism thrown in there somewhere ;)

I think only a small % of a small % have what it takes.

In the past those who could not, would not, even if they tried a little
first.

Now those who can not, do, but do so with absolutely no understanding or
sane guardrails (Dunning Kruger comes into play here also).

> >
> > There are some patchsets in my inbox that I instinctively just skipped,
> > because they were huge new patchsets from new AIs (not people, really),
> > only to watch in dismay as they burned up other people's time in
> > review attempts.

I fear doing so in case things end up getting merged mistakenly.

But I am certainly a lot more quickly dismissive of this crap than I used
to be, simply because I only have finite time and an infinite amount of
work to do :)

> >
> > thanks,
> > --
> > John Hubbard
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi

--
Cheers, Lorenzo