Re: AI slop (was Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: let special huge VMAs bypass the THP) policy check

"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Message-ID <anTHSfP9Eq-2-Cng@lucifer>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:40:16PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> > On 6 Aug 2026, at 13:05, John Hubbard wrote:
> >
> > > And furthermore, that's not even a change in policy! Because traditionally,
> > > that's how people started anyway: with small patches and patience. It's
> >
> > Patience is the key. Seeing patches refreshed within a day is killing me.
> >
>
> some kind of 2-stage filtering mechanism maybe?
>
> mm gets everything
> mm-review is curated from mm to reduce noise
>
> Maybe would have to leverage a model though to surface critical things.
>
> Just an idea.

No I don't want slop going anywhere, at all. Nothing.

If you slop the reward should be silence ideally. And certainly not anything you
slopped going to any kind of branch... :)

The slopularity is upon is Gregory. Behold the desert of the real etc.

>
> ~Gregory

--
Cheers, Lorenzo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.