Re: AI slop (was Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: let special huge VMAs bypass the THP) policy check
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anTHSfP9Eq-2-Cng@lucifer> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:40:16PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: > > On 6 Aug 2026, at 13:05, John Hubbard wrote: > > > > > And furthermore, that's not even a change in policy! Because traditionally, > > > that's how people started anyway: with small patches and patience. It's > > > > Patience is the key. Seeing patches refreshed within a day is killing me. > > > > some kind of 2-stage filtering mechanism maybe? > > mm gets everything > mm-review is curated from mm to reduce noise > > Maybe would have to leverage a model though to surface critical things. > > Just an idea. No I don't want slop going anywhere, at all. Nothing. If you slop the reward should be silence ideally. And certainly not anything you slopped going to any kind of branch... :) The slopularity is upon is Gregory. Behold the desert of the real etc. > > ~Gregory -- Cheers, Lorenzo