Re: LTTng 0.6.25 patch missing bits?

* Christopher Yeoh ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is it my imagination or is the 0.6.25 patch (and some earlier ones I
> think) missing a definition for atomic64_up_t (for powerpc)?
> 
> Regards,
> 

I should change atomic64_up_t for atomic64_t in both powerpc and x86_64, thanks
for reporting this, will fix.

Mathieu

> Chris
> -- 
> [email protected]
> IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group, ADL
> Canberra, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Ltt-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listserv.shafik.org/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 
OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68