Re: Notes after 5.2 release

kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Organization none
Message-ID <2872614.m2eLSB3fHR@stalker>
HI Erich;

Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 11:21:10 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> 
> Am 26.09.2015 um 18:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> > 
> > Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 17:05:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >> 
> >> Am 26.09.2015 um 16:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >>> Hi Erich;
> >>> 
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015, 13:08:14 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >>>> Hi KP
> >>>> 
> >>>> Am 22.09.2015 um 18:27 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >>>>> In 5.2  a major target will be to finally get Erich's update mimic up
> >>>>> and
> 
> Some more questions
> 
> 5_2 appears to be fully populated for upgrade, should we make a tag to
> mark this state?

Yes; files are identical with he released images as you requested.
Please do.


> What would you call the first release of 5_2? 5.2.0 or 5.2.1 ?

5.2.1

> Definitely upgrade still has a bug in whatever is 5_2 right now, so the
> config.lrp package needs to be updated. I guess this already calls for a
> new bugfix release :-(

No problem. I've already committed two updates and still have two in the queue 
waiting as well as new package for lighttpd.
And upgrade hasn't officially announced and documented yet.

I expect we'll do 5.2.1 within a month.

Please improve/cleanup(?)  also the sparse usage message in upgrade if you 
touch it.

A remaining question is, if we should remove updater.lrp? I believe it does 
nearly the same but I never tested it and don't know if it still works as 
expected....???


kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.