Re: Fwd: [leaf:packages] New commit by kapeka

kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Organization none
Message-ID <131233124.SoMRRGgzr1@stalker>
Hello Erich;

Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> I checked the contents of the 5_2 directory this morning using
> build_upgrade
> 
> running build_upgrade with parameters 5.2.x 5_2

while this is fine for testing, we'll need more work for a comprehensive 
solution within the build process.
As I said before, some of the packages are committed from packages directory, 
the kernel from build dir and some finally from the images. This requires a lot 
of manual intervention and should be improved.
Ideas welcome.

> 
> I checked as far as I could, now starting to build the upgrade branch
> Gewechselt zu einem neuen Branch '5.2.x'
> delete 3_1
> delete 4_0
> delete 4_3
> delete 5_0
> delete 5_1
> skip 5_2 it is in the delete_mask
> delete latest
> delete stable
> delete stable-test
> skip tools it is in the delete_mask
> 
> If you continue here the changes made by build_upgrade will be committed
> to branch 5.2.x.
> Do you wish to continue? Y/N (N)
> 
> It appears that no missing files were detected. However build_upgrade
> does not handle firmware yet and thus master is not yet ready to be
> tagged. I will extend build_upgrade to include handling of the firmware
> tarball too.
> 
> Andrew incuded modules.sqfs to be unpacked and used at system boot, but
> how is the firmware tarball to be used? I am not sure the firmware
> tarball is used anywhere but in the upgrade tool. Here the use of a
> squash file system would be reasonable too.

Currently the firmware.tgz needs user intervention.
One can unpack firmware and copy required files to /lib/firmware and then they'll 
saved with lrcfg... 
To support more automagic integration AFAIK we need either to enhance modules 
or to come up with a new config file. Or something else.
 
> Also I believe we can remove the stable-test directory and, to be
> honest, I am not sure we need to conserve 3_1 and 4_0.

stabble-test has been what it says - a branch you've created for testing.

I agree we don't need 3_1 and 4_0 any longer, but IMHO it doesn't hurt to keep 
as-is.

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.