Re: strongswan.lrp
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.leaf.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | none |
| Message-ID | <3876394.UXHQb5ZWMx@stalker> |
Hi Erich; Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 12:02:08 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > As the old ipsec.lrp has been changed to strongswan.lrp, did anyone > follow up with checking and renaming ipsec.lwp? Remember my suggestion > to include the webconf files in the packages :-) No I didn't. I don't know if ipsec.lwp (then named strongswan.lwp) will work for strongswan. Your point adding lwp's to pacjages is not valid in this case - ipsec.lwp would have been buried in ipsec.lrp; strongswan.lrp is a complete new package. Probably you'll have some time, to check if ipsec.lwp can be adopted to be used with strongswan as well? kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------