Re: strongswan.lrp

kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Organization none
Message-ID <3876394.UXHQb5ZWMx@stalker>
Hi Erich;

Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 12:02:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
> 
> As the old ipsec.lrp has been changed to strongswan.lrp, did anyone
> follow up with checking and renaming ipsec.lwp? Remember my suggestion
> to include the webconf files in the packages :-)

No I didn't.

I don't know if ipsec.lwp (then named strongswan.lwp) will work for 
strongswan.

Your point adding lwp's to pacjages is not valid in this case  - ipsec.lwp 
would have been buried in ipsec.lrp; strongswan.lrp is a complete new package.

Probably you'll have some time, to check if ipsec.lwp can be adopted to be 
used with strongswan as well?

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.