Re: strongswan.lrp

Hi KP

Am 20.12.2015 um 15:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Hi Erich;
> ...
> 
> Your point adding lwp's to pacjages is not valid in this case  - ipsec.lwp 
> would have been buried in ipsec.lrp; strongswan.lrp is a complete new package.

Well, ipsec.lrp was _not_ called openswan.lrp :-)

> 
> Probably you'll have some time, to check if ipsec.lwp can be adopted to be 
> used with strongswan as well?

Right now I don't have sufficient infrastructure for a test. Will see
hopefully soon.

cheers

ET

------------------------------------------------------------------------------