Re: tmpfs

Erich Titl <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:28:32 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Boris

Am 02.12.2024 um 16:52 schrieb Boris via leaf-user:
> Am 02.12.24 um 16:45 schrieb Boris via leaf-user:
>> Am 02.12.24 um 16:36 schrieb Boris via leaf-user:
>>> Am 25.11.24 um 17:28 schrieb KP.Kirchdoerfer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> first of all, logging is complicated, and maybe even a mess. 
>>>> Historically grown
>>>> from different log routines and programs, as well as some packages 
>>>> providing
>>>> their own mechanisms and so son - I agree this needs more 
>>>> consolidation and
>>>> explanation/documentation.
>>>
>>> Hej everybody,
>>> hej Erich and KP,
>>>
>>> some days are gone and I can put one on top.
>>>
>>> After commenting the log-Parameters 'stdout' in hostapd.conf, 
>>> behaviour seemed much better.
>>>
>>> Today I wanted to monitor a new dhcp-client with tail -f /var/log/ 
>>> dameon.log an found:
>>>
>>> # tail -f /var/log/daemon.log
>> [snip]
>>> b8:27:eb:0f:56:dc
>>> Dec  1 05:44:44 192 dnsmasq[2808]: overflow: 2248 log entries lost
>>> Dec  1 05:44:44 192 dnsmasq-dhcp[2808]: DHCPACK(eth1) 192.168.23.196 
>>> b8:27:eb:0f:56:dc nl-raspi2-koje
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> root                     64.0M     42.6M     21.4M  67% /
>>>
>>> That's still the old game....
>>>
>>
>> To get daemon.log working again, I restarted dnsmasq - with no success.
>> So I restarted rsyslog - with a surprising insight:
>>
>> # /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart
>> Stopping rsyslog daemon: FAIL
>> Starting rsyslog daemon: OK

Again rsyslog appears to be stopped or the stop command does something 
weird.

>>
>> daemon.log active again, 
> 
> In the reactivated daemon.log I found this:
> 
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using nameserver 213.178.70.1#53
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using nameserver 8.8.8.8#53
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zmedia.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zintext.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zeusclicks.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zeus.developershed.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zenzuu.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zenkreka.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zencudo.co.uk
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using only locally-known addresses 
> for zedo.com
> Dec  2 15:39:36 192 dnsmasq[10951]: using 2434 more local addresses
> 
> That is completely mysterious to me...

Looks like dnsmasq is restarted, getting its uplink servers and then 
applies local name resolution for a number of domains. This you would 
find in your dnsmasq configuration.

cheers

ET

-- 
„Wer von seinem Tag nicht zwei Drittel für sich hat, ist ein Sklave.“
―Friedrich Nietzsche



------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/