Re: r11.2-297

"Bruce Dubbs" ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.automated
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/31/23 15:18, Ken Moffat ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) 
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:01:52PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 17:26 +0100, Dragan wrote:
>>> I've successfully build r11.2-297.
>>>
>>> Log attached.
>>>
>>> Dragan
>>
>> Hmmm, weird that you need 130 sec to build binutils pass 1 at -j16. It's around
>> 30 sec for me... Have you had a look at the cpuidle governor for your kernel?
>>
>> Pierre
>> PS: By tweaking the cpuidle governor, I could decrease the SBU at -j1 from 130
>> to 80 seconds...
> 
> For information, on my Ryzen 4750G a -j1 build of binutils from
> r11.2-296 on a host system running r11.2-150 took 103.999 seconds.
> Building binutils pass 1 on the completed system took 127.307
> seconds.
> 
> In each case the host system, but not binutils pass 1, had some
> optimzations and hardening, and both were running a 6.1.8 kernel.
> 
> You guys with your your souped-up hardware ;-)

I just did a fresh build this morning.  For me, my binutils-pass1 was also 104 
seconds at -j1.  However at -j22, -pass2 was 34 seconds.

I do not normally change the cpufreq governor or scaling_governor.  The 
scaling_governor is currently set to 'userspace'.

Ryzen 9 3900X

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/alfs-discuss
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.