Re: Reorganization of KDE chapter

On 2025-01-15 07:58, Rainer Fiebig wrote:

> Sorry, but from my perspective as a user this doesn't seem to be a good
> idea.  If I understand correctly, it would complicate and fragment a
> coherent and proven KDE-build-sequence and thus make life (even) harder
> for users.  I'm not against reducing redundancy, though.
> 

If we call it kf6-minimal and kf6-additional I could see it as okay and 
not **that** confusing to the user.

> In my view, jhalfs should not be a primary reason for significant
> changes of the books.
> 
> Just my two cents.
> 
> Rainer


--Rahul

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page