Re: Reorganization of KDE chapter

Am 15.01.25 um 16:02 schrieb Rahul Chandra ([email protected] via
blfs-dev Mailing List):
> On 2025-01-15 07:58, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
> 
>> Sorry, but from my perspective as a user this doesn't seem to be a good
>> idea.  If I understand correctly, it would complicate and fragment a
>> coherent and proven KDE-build-sequence and thus make life (even) harder
>> for users.  I'm not against reducing redundancy, though.
>>
> 
> If we call it kf6-minimal and kf6-additional I could see it as okay and
> not **that** confusing to the user.
At least one user _is_ confused already. ;)

I really cant't see any benefit for users from this and I think that the
changes would be made for the wrong reason (jhalfs).  KDE-Frameworks is
an entity that can and IMO should be built in one go and not one part
here and another part there.  Complicating and fragmenting the process
surely wouldn't help users.

Rainer

> 
>> In my view, jhalfs should not be a primary reason for significant
>> changes of the books.
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> Rainer
> 
> 
> --Rahul
>

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page