| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On 2/14/25 3:55 PM, Ken Moffat ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) wrote:
> I'm slowly working through my scripts, hoping to get a partially useful
> desktop system for TL2025 (binary) pretest although at the moment
> the omens do not look good. Anyway, I got to fluxbox and saw:
>
> First, fix a build failure when building with gcc-11.1
>
> I *could* interpret that as 'no longer needed' but it is still in
> the book for gcc-14 and worked on my last build, so I propose that
> explanations with a package version should say 'or later'. Many
> already do, maybe this is just one of those things that has slipped
> through.
>
> For gcc, similar text for gcc-14 for libcddb, gtksourceview and gs
> (ghostscript). The latter actually says 'with gcc-14 and libidn' so
> maybe a libidn version or later should go there. The ghostscript
> entry seems to have come in between BLFS-12.1 and BLFS-12.2,
> probably for gcc-10.03-series, so gcc-14 or later and libidn-1.42 or
> later. (Obviously, gcc-14 is current at the moment so those messages
> do not look odd.)
>
> Also, in itstool
>
> First, fix some compatibility problems with Python-3.12
>
> I can fix these if people wish, but maybe I'm overthinking it ?
We are going through all the packages now for BLFS-12.3. If there is a left over fix
that is not needed any more, we need to remove those. If it's just a text issue and
need to add 'and later', go ahead.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page