References to old versions in sed explanations

"Ken Moffat" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm slowly working through my scripts, hoping to get a partially useful
desktop system for TL2025 (binary) pretest although at the moment
the omens do not look good. Anyway, I got to fluxbox and saw:

First, fix a build failure when building with gcc-11.1

I *could* interpret that as 'no longer needed' but it is still in
the book for gcc-14 and worked on my last build, so I propose that
explanations with a package version should say 'or later'. Many
already do, maybe this is just one of those things that has slipped
through.

For gcc, similar text for gcc-14 for libcddb, gtksourceview and gs
(ghostscript). The latter actually says 'with gcc-14 and libidn' so
maybe a libidn version or later should go there. The ghostscript
entry seems to have come in between BLFS-12.1 and BLFS-12.2,
probably for gcc-10.03-series, so gcc-14 or later and libidn-1.42 or
later. (Obviously, gcc-14 is current at the moment so those messages
do not look odd.)

Also, in itstool

First, fix some compatibility problems with Python-3.12

I can fix these if people wish, but maybe I'm overthinking it ?

ĸen
-- 
    When it was cold, we used to sit by a candle for warmth.
    If it got really cold we lit it.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.