Re: Last-minute typos

"Julien Lepiller" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Le 28 février 2025 11:09:22 GMT+01:00, Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> a écrit :
>On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 08:18 +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Hi, here are a few typos found during translation. I tried sending
>> that
>> yesterday, but with a wrong email adress, and I haven't seen that
>> email
>> appear in the list yet. Sorry if this is a duplicate (there's one more
>> typo here than yesterday).
>> 
>> general/genlib/qca.xml:132 missing ":" as with the other identical
>> sentences in "To test the results, issue"
>> 
>> general/graphlib/libpng.xml:11 "14 (with tests)" is missing a unit.
>> 
>> general/graphlib/opencv.xml:211 after "instructs the build system to
>> build additional modules", there is an opening parenthesis, but no
>> closing one.
>> 
>> general/sysutils/sysmond.xml:84 "In many chases" should be "In many
>> cases"
>> 
>> introduction/important/building-notes.xml:1317  "the linker (singular)
>> have (plural) also enabled ..."
>
>> kde/plasma5/plasma-all.xml:273 there is a leading ":" here. I'm not
>> sure the file is still in use in the latest BLFS though. I keep older
>> files around in case they are reinstated: it speeds up translation.
>> 
>> postlfs/config/firmware.xml:20 there is a "/" missing in
>> "<filename>usr/lib</filename>"
>
>No.  This is quite deliberate.  The symlink is to a relative path, not
>an absolute path, and the difference is very, very, very important. 
>Recently a user has just broken the host distro due to making $LFS/usr
>point to /usr/lib instead of usr/lib.

I see! Since the sentence is in BLFS, I'm not sure it matters anymore, but I understand the difference.

>
>> postlfs/security/linux-pam.xml:161 "those BLFS does not provide" ->
>> "that BLFS does not provide"?
>> 
>> pst/typesetting/tl-installer.xml:294 « if the path in the location
>> specified » -> « if the path is the location specified »
>> 
>> xsoft/office/libreoffice.xml:343 "fix a bug that prevents the install
>> from failing" so do we want the install to fail? :)
>
>:(
>
>> xsoft/other/freerdp.xml:27 "a RDP" -> "an RDP"
>
>Fixed all for trunk but the usr/lib one which is NOT a typo.
>

Thanks!

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.