Re: Question about Xorg

"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2025-07-01 at 01:49 -0300, Jamenson Espindula wrote:
> As anyone can see

I cannot.  If you just gather the random mails from archive you can find
those ones claiming X was "controversial" and Windoge/Apple are
"better."  I just don't believe random Internet sources, esp. in the
context of (B)LFS, as they've *already* caused many misunderstandings
about (B)LFS.

> the protocol named "wayland" still is very
> controversial and the protocol named "X11" still is the safe and
> stable choice nowadays.

Sorry but *even if* this is true BLFS still supports X11, via Xorg.  And
it's just working fine, without a need to use a different fork.

If we start to replace Xorg with Xlibre *anyone* can just fork any
package in the book and claim the fork is "better" and urge us to use
the fork.  This would just destabilize the mental of every editor.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.