Re: NASM-3.00 causes build failures, recommend downgrading

"lfs" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Oct 2025 23:06:03 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Monday, October 6th, 2025 at 03:44, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Let's give it a week to see if upstream makes the needed fixes. Most of the packages
> that use nasm are in multimedia and mozilla. I see 21 references to nasm in the book
> but not all of them are broken. For instance lame and sdl2 and ffmpeg are OK.
> 
> -- Bruce

Is there any scope for installing NASM-3.00 as its own Book section, 
deployed so that it is invoked as, say, nasm-3, al la python-s passim,
and so allows for packages, that can make use of it, to do so, whilst 
continuing using the previous version, where the newer NASM breaks
something?

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page