Re: NASM-3.00 causes build failures, recommend downgrading
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/6/25 6:06 PM, lfs ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) wrote: > On Monday, October 6th, 2025 at 03:44, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Let's give it a week to see if upstream makes the needed fixes. Most of the packages >> that use nasm are in multimedia and mozilla. I see 21 references to nasm in the book >> but not all of them are broken. For instance lame and sdl2 and ffmpeg are OK. > Is there any scope for installing NASM-3.00 as its own Book section, > deployed so that it is invoked as, say, nasm-3, al la python-s passim, > and so allows for packages, that can make use of it, to do so, whilst > continuing using the previous version, where the newer NASM breaks > something? Nothing like that is needed. We already have nasm-3.01-rc1 and that appears to fix the problems. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page