Re: 'Qt-6.10.1' page:

On 12/11/25 4:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via blfs-dev 
Mailing List) wrote:
> On 12/11/25 2:55 PM, Jamenson Espindula ([email protected] via blfs-dev 
> Mailing List) wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> It was written:
>>
>> If <xref linkend="libqtxdg"/>, <xref linkend="qca"/>, <xref
>> linkend="qcoro"/>, or <xref linkend="sddm"/> have been installed and
>> you are reinstalling or updating this package, then those packages
>> will need to be reinstalled.
>>
>> I would like to suggest the following text:
>>
>> If you are reinstalling or updating this package, then <xref
>> linkend="libqtxdg"/>, <xref linkend="qca"/>, <xref linkend="qcoro"/>,
>> or <xref linkend="sddm"/> will need to be reinstalled.
>
> I'm thinking that you are suggesting this because it does not translate
> well for you.  That's OK.
>
> However I'll point out that sddm does not need to be installed at all, 
> but
> your reading implies that is should be 'reinstalled'.
>
> qca is only needed for kf6/plasma apps that may not be installed.
>
> I do think the paragraph is a bit redundant though.  If you have 
> libqtxdg,
> qca, qcoro, or sddm installed, then you already have qt installed.  This
> means you are definitely reinstalling.
>
> So I suppose a better way of saying this is:
>
> If any of libqtxdg, qca, qcoro, or sddm have been installed, then
> they will need to be reinstalled after installing this package. 

I would propose:

   If any of libqtxdg, qca, qcoro, or sddm have been installed, then 
they will need to be reinstalled after updating this package.

In most cases a reinstall of a package shouldn't require rebuilding 
anything that depends on it.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page