Re: 'Qt-6.10.1' page:
"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Dec 2025 11:41:29 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 16:25 -0500, Joe Locash wrote: > On 12/11/25 4:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via blfs-dev > Mailing List) wrote: > > On 12/11/25 2:55 PM, Jamenson Espindula ([email protected] via blfs-dev > > Mailing List) wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > > > It was written: > > > > > > If <xref linkend="libqtxdg"/>, <xref linkend="qca"/>, <xref > > > linkend="qcoro"/>, or <xref linkend="sddm"/> have been installed and > > > you are reinstalling or updating this package, then those packages > > > will need to be reinstalled. > > > > > > I would like to suggest the following text: > > > > > > If you are reinstalling or updating this package, then <xref > > > linkend="libqtxdg"/>, <xref linkend="qca"/>, <xref linkend="qcoro"/>, > > > or <xref linkend="sddm"/> will need to be reinstalled. > > > > I'm thinking that you are suggesting this because it does not translate > > well for you. That's OK. > > > > However I'll point out that sddm does not need to be installed at all, > > but > > your reading implies that is should be 'reinstalled'. > > > > qca is only needed for kf6/plasma apps that may not be installed. > > > > I do think the paragraph is a bit redundant though. If you have > > libqtxdg, > > qca, qcoro, or sddm installed, then you already have qt installed. This > > means you are definitely reinstalling. > > > > So I suppose a better way of saying this is: > > > > If any of libqtxdg, qca, qcoro, or sddm have been installed, then > > they will need to be reinstalled after installing this package. > > I would propose: > > If any of libqtxdg, qca, qcoro, or sddm have been installed, then > they will need to be reinstalled after updating this package. > > In most cases a reinstall of a package shouldn't require rebuilding > anything that depends on it. The problem of Qt6 is many packages in wild is using the "private" Qt ABI that the Qt developers do not expect other packages to use. This is different from most packages. Regarding the translation issue I still think the translator should simply disable the overly-restrictive "checking" in some translation platforms, instead of randomly changing the English book to satisfy them. The grammar constructions of different languages are just so different that those checking are stupid. -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page