Re: Hi, I'm back (somehow)
"Rainer Fiebig" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 11:15:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1779873363-21132-32859 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 27.05.26 um 10:38 schrieb Pierre Scotney ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List): > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 05:14:40AM +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Forgive my recent silence as an editor of LFS/BLFS, this was almost >> exclusively down to professional matters (I got laid off by the company), >> I'm still fully behind the idea, goals and general management of LFS/BLFS. >> >> However, as those of you knowing me probably assumed, I'm of course totally >> and unequivocally against the recently made decision of dropping SYSV >> support in LFS/BLFS. >> >> But as I was not of any help at the time of the decision, I naturally have >> to accept it, I had the chance to object, but didn't take it, my bad. >> >> I have now decided to go on like this: I will maintain a separate fork of >> LFS/BLFS at my home, for anybody that does not want to submit to systemd as >> being the only way to run a self-created Linux system. >> >> Because I don't, and I never will. And if it's just because this bloated >> piece of garbage was provably shoved down everybody's throat by a provably >> lying and manipulative former employee of Red Had and now Microsoft, with >> the very clearly stated goal of driving non-compliant UNIX's out of >> business. >> >> I cannot be part of that, sorry, I'm too moral for this. >> >> But I still hope that my sysv fork and Xi Ruoyao's mainline can maintain a >> friendly partnership. I just would like LFS to point to a choice outside of >> Poetteringverse. It's much nicer there. >> >> >> Bye >> Tim > > Hello Tim, > > Welcome back. I am sorry to hear about your professional situation, I > hope things have/are working out for you regarding employment. > > I too was disappointed by the decision to drop SysV init due to GNOME > and KDE requiring SystemD. Personally, I don't use either desktop AFAIK, KDE's Plasma doesn't yet require systemd. The argument was that it may so in the future. Rainer ------------=_1779873363-21132-32859 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page ------------=_1779873363-21132-32859--