Re: glib-skip_warnings-1.patch: is it of any use at all?
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 24.08.25 um 12:30 schrieb Xi Ruoyao ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List): > On Sun, 2025-08-24 at 12:08 +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >> I've always applied the above mentioned optional patch but never set the >> accompanying variable GLIB_LOG_LEVEL to suppress unwanted warnings. But >> although many programs use/need glib, the logs are _not_ flooded with >> glib-related unwanted/superfluous messages. >> >> So I'm wondering under what concrete circumstances or for what specific >> programs the patch is of use. Thanks. > > When I tried the Xe kernel driver for the Core Ultra 5 125H iGPU, gtk4- > demo spammed the stderr because DMABuf upload is not implemented for the > Xe driver (hundreds of warnings per second). I guess this patch can > suppress those warnings. > > I don't apply this patch at all in my build and my solution was > reverting to i915 (the default driver for 125H iGPU) instead of Xe, > though. Thanks. I'll also skip it in the future unless faced with a problem like you've described. Rainer -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page