Re: glib-skip_warnings-1.patch: is it of any use at all?
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2025-08-24 at 12:08 +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote: > I've always applied the above mentioned optional patch but never set the > accompanying variable GLIB_LOG_LEVEL to suppress unwanted warnings. But > although many programs use/need glib, the logs are _not_ flooded with > glib-related unwanted/superfluous messages. > > So I'm wondering under what concrete circumstances or for what specific > programs the patch is of use. Thanks. When I tried the Xe kernel driver for the Core Ultra 5 125H iGPU, gtk4- demo spammed the stderr because DMABuf upload is not implemented for the Xe driver (hundreds of warnings per second). I guess this patch can suppress those warnings. I don't apply this patch at all in my build and my solution was reverting to i915 (the default driver for 125H iGPU) instead of Xe, though. -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page