Re: [LFS Trac] #5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful

"LFS Trac" ([email protected] via lfs-book Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.book
Message-ID <[email protected]>
#5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful
-------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  Xi Ruoyao    |       Owner:  lfs-book
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  12.4
Component:  Book         |     Version:  git
 Severity:  normal       |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-----------------------
Description changed by Xi Ruoyao:

Old description:

> We no longer "modify dynamic linker path" so checking the dynamic linker
> path is just meaningless.  To me we should do a sanity check like what we
> are doing for chapter 8 glibc instead.
>
> I plan to update the sanity check it after 12.3 release, just create a
> ticket to remind myself.

New description:

 We no longer "modify dynamic linker path" so simply checking the dynamic
 linker path is just meaningless.  To me we should do a sanity check like
 what we are doing for chapter 8 glibc instead.

 I plan to update the sanity check it after 12.3 release, just create a
 ticket to remind myself.

--
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5651#comment:1>
LFS Trac <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-book
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.